serg70
213
Thank you for explanation!
Jan 11, 2022,22:02 PM
Indeed the same case (it would be great to find pic of case back for both references to check the producer). Do you have it occasionally? ))
Different ebauchee, I agree. Probably also pulsometer vs tachimeter scale? Only 6 pcs vs 3 pcs?
Without photos and records to much space for interpretation... And 'modification' as well ((
With best regards
Serge
Comments:
view entire thread
Thank you, Dean
By: serg70 : January 11th, 2022-19:22
for correction, and sorry for price info, dont wanted to break the rules (( Fully agree with you, only Extract can mislead buyers (and auction house as well) and is not enough to check and evaluate a watch. Hopefully the watch is redialed at VC, but I dou...
My theory: it's both!
By: Tick Talk : January 11th, 2022-21:35
The same case design was used for both; first as photo reference 3768 in 1937 with cal. 295 based on a Martel ebauche, subsequently changed to model reference 4111 in 1939 when the photo reference system was discontinued. For the 4111, the movement was ch...
Thank you for explanation!
By: serg70 : January 11th, 2022-22:02
Indeed the same case (it would be great to find pic of case back for both references to check the producer). Do you have it occasionally? )) Different ebauchee, I agree. Probably also pulsometer vs tachimeter scale? Only 6 pcs vs 3 pcs? Without photos and...